Table 4 Localization performance for each single-source combination in the linear array setup. Performance is contrasted with both the baseline and the upper bound. P3-P5 was omitted as it is an intractable case with the array in use.
From: Multiple Source Localization Based on Acoustic Map De-Emphasis
| Â | GCF | M-OGCF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â |
|
|
| Baseline |
|
|
| Baseline |
P1-P2 | 6.5 | 0.7 | 96.2% | 35.4% | 7.5 | 0.7 | 96.2% | 37.7% |
P1-P3 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 91.4% | 52.6% | 9.5 | 2.5 | 90.8% | 53.3% |
P1-P4 | 10.5 | 2.5 | 100.0% | 32.6% | 2.5 | 1.0 | 99.0% | 32.6% |
P1-P5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 100.0% | 52.1% | 6.5 | 2.0 | 100.0% | 52.1% |
P2-P3 | 9.5 | 2.5 | 90.1% | 15.1% | 9.5 | 2.5 | 90.1% | 15.9% |
P2-P4 | 10.5 | 0.7 | 96.1% | 1.3% | 6.5 | 0.7 | 93.4% | 1.3% |
P2-P5 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 67.4% | 9.5% | 7.5 | 1.5 | 67.4% | 9.5% |
P3-P4 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 92.2% | 24.5% | 4.5 | 1.0 | 92.2% | 23.5% |
P4-P5 | 8.5 | 0.7 | 97.9% | 60.1% | 9.5 | 1.0 | 96.6% | 61.5 |
Best | — | — | 92.7% | 34.6% | — | — | 92.2% | 35.1% |
