Table 2 FN, FP, TN, and TP rates of detecting voiced/unvoiced regions through HMEM2 and the HSMM-based method
# training data | Implemented systems | Really voiced (%) | Really unvoiced (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | HMEM2 | Voiced | 77.00 | 3.70 |
Unvoiced | 7.09 | 12.21 | ||
HSMM | Voiced | 78.23 | 5.79 | |
Unvoiced | 5.86 | 10.12 | ||
100 | HMEM2 | Voiced | 75.78 | 2.75 |
Unvoiced | 8.31 | 13.16 | ||
HSMM | Voiced | 78.07 | 5.34 | |
Unvoiced | 6.02 | 10.57 | ||
200 | HMEM2 | Voiced | 77.25 | 1.54 |
Unvoiced | 6.84 | 14.37 | ||
HSMM | Voiced | 78.43 | 4.43 | |
Unvoiced | 5.66 | 11.48 | ||
400 | HMEM2 | Voiced | 77.18 | 1.34 |
Unvoiced | 6.91 | 14.57 | ||
HSMM | Voiced | 76.09 | 2.70 | |
Unvoiced | 8.00 | 13.21 | ||
800 | HMEM2 | Voiced | 77.10 | 0.83 |
Unvoiced | 6.99 | 15.08 | ||
HSMM | Voiced | 77.17 | 2.66 | |
Unvoiced | 6.92 | 13.25 | ||