Skip to main content
EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Table 6 Average computation overhead (percent) per frame of the five doctors

From: Integrated exemplar-based template matching and statistical modeling for continuous speech recognition

 

All templates (LLR)

MLTS (KL)

Template compression (KL)

Test frame labeling overhead

43.3

43.3

23.3

Rescoring overhead

26.7

5.4

5.4

Overall computational overhead

70.0

48.7

28.7

  1. Computational overhead per frame using LLR-based all templates and KL-based MLTS and template selection for five doctors in the telehealth task.
Back to article page