Skip to main content

Table 2 Eightfold cross-validation result of the fingering detection system

From: Detecting fingering of overblown flute sound using sparse feature learning

  

SVM

Random forest

Note

Feature (dim.)

P f  ± σ 2 Pf

P f  ± σ2 Pf (Mp)

P f  ± σ2 Pf

P f  ± σ 2 Pf (Mp)

C5

MFCCs (39)

9.87 ± 1.57

8.07 ± 1.00

14.91 ± 1.91

12.20 ± 1.05

SF (39)

0.55 ± 0.47

0.20 ± 0.27

0.68 ± 0.52

0.13 ± 0.24

SF (1024)

0.26 ± 0.24

0.00 ± 0.00

0.36 ± 0.24

0.07 ± 0.19

D5

MFCCs (39)

7.43 ± 1.30

8.21 ± 0.82

10.16 ± 1.59

10.20 ± 2.42

SF (39)

2.20 ± 0.78

1.41 ± 1.12

1.48 ± 0.54

0.40 ± 0.51

SF (1024)

1.67 ± 0.72

1.18 ± 0.68

1.00 ± 0.36

0.39 ± 0.38

C6

MFCCs (39)

8.47 ± 0.86

6.91 ± 1.48

11.78 ± 1.59

8.91 ± 0.82

SF (39)

2.08 ± 0.88

1.50 ± 0.80

1.30 ± 0.50

0.67 ± 0.40

SF (1024)

0.76 ± 0.42

0.13 ± 0.17

0.56 ± 0.34

0.04 ± 0.12

C#6

MFCCs (39)

7.01 ± 0.62

5.47 ± 0.90

9.31 ± 1.01

6.02 ± 0.98

SF (39)

1.39 ± 0.72

1.07 ± 0.82

1.26 ± 0.52

0.56 ± 0.33

SF (1024)

0.31 ± 0.29

0.08 ± 0.15

0.29 ± 0.27

0.04 ± 0.11

E6

MFCCs (39)

6.36 ± 0.78

4.56 ± 0.90

7.43 ± 0.96

4.80 ± 1.27

SF (39)

2.35 ± 0.79

1.74 ± 0.76

2.03 ± 0.46

1.31 ± 0.51

SF (1024)

1.06 ± 0.48

1.11 ± 0.30

1.02 ± 0.37

0.34 ± 0.24

G6

MFCCs (39)

13.80 ± 1.14

12.77 ± 1.28

13.76 ± 1.12

10.63 ± 0.96

SF (39)

5.71 ± 1.30

4.49 ± 0.76

4.62 ± 1.26

3.22 ± 0.58

SF (1024)

1.53 ± 0.53

1.06 ± 0.54

1.55 ± 0.36

1.06 ± 0.44

  1. Mean and standard deviations of detection error (P f  ± σ 2 Pf ) probabilities (%) using MFCCs and sparse filtering (SF) for 39 and 1024 units. SVM and random forest were used for the classifications, and probabilities are given for features without and with max-pooling (Mp)