Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 10 Evaluation over all instruments and all Plackett-Burman Designs (factors as in Table 5)

From: A computational study of auditory models in music recognition tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

  a b
Fit \(R^{2} = 0.30, R_{a}^{2} = 0.12\) \(R^{2} = 0.37, R_{a}^{2} = 0.21\)
Coefficients Estim. p value Estim. p value
(Intercept) 0.0660 2e −08 0.0111 9e −04
Interval −0.0074 0.40 0.0049 0.11
Onsets acc. 0.0056 0.53 0.0037 0.23
Dynamic −0.0142 0.11 −0.0019 0.54
Acc. 0.0148 0.10 0.0056 0.07
Mean pitch −0.0068 0.44 0.0062 0.05
Tone dur. −0.0025 0.78 0.0025 0.42
Mel. − acc. −0.0185 0.04 −0.0056 0.07
  1. The error rate is the target variable— a: pitch estimation and SVM (auditory model + DFT), b: instrument recognition and SVM (auditory model features)—(italics = significant at 10% level)