Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 SNR-based relative percent EER reduction rates for GMM-UBM method compared to Drugman’s VAD (second and fourth column) and Rangachari’s method (third and fifth column). Computed by averaging over all noise types

From: A robust polynomial regression-based voice activity detector for speaker verification

SNR level (dB) Relative EER reduction compared to Dugman’s (male) Relative EER reduction compared to Rangachari’s (male) Relative EER reduction compared to Drugman’s (female) Relative EER reduction compared to Rangachari’s (female)
− 10 15.62 20.78 8.02 18.28
− 5 20.84 32.05 18.41 31.97
0 7.44 31.33 14.58 38.82
5 5.02 34.31 10.65 41.83
10 14.02 42.65 13.69 40.25
Average 12.59 32.22 13.07 34.23