Skip to main content
Fig. 9 | EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

Fig. 9

From: Interaural time difference individualization in HRTF by scaling through anthropometric parameters

Fig. 9

Four selected examples of validation measurements with scaled ITD. Radial units are in ms. a Excellent adjustment and coincident for both subjective and objective criteria (MSE 31.21). b good adjustment for subjective criterion (MSE 252.69) and very good adjustment for objective criterion (MSE 55.00). c Bad adjustment for both subjective (MSE 937.92) and objective criteria (MSE 533.62). d Very good adjustment and nearly coincident for both subjective (MSE 160.53) and objective criteria (MSE 44.60)

Back to article page