Table 5 Model performance comparison under different attention mechanisms based on FOA and MIC format dataset
\(\rho\) | On FOA format dataset | On MIC format dataset | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE (\(^\circ\)) | FR (\(\%\)) | ER | F1-score (\(\%\)) | DE (\(^\circ\)) | FR (\(\%\)) | ER | F1-score (\(\%\)) | |
1 | 4.9 | 90.1 | 0.22 | 87.9 | 5.0 | 89.1 | 0.25 | 86.7 |
2 | 4.8 | 89.3 | 0.23 | 88.3 | 4.9 | 88.3 | 0.26 | 87.4 |
4 | 4.9 | 89.6 | 0.21 | 88.4 | 5.3 | 88.6 | 0.23 | 87.3 |
8 | 5.0 | 88.9 | 0.22 | 85.6 | 5.1 | 87.9 | 0.25 | 84.5 |
16 | 4.7 | 89.0 | 0.23 | 86.7 | 4.9 | 88.0 | 0.24 | 85.6 |