Table 2 Comparison of proposed scheme with existing work under noisy condition
SNR | Method | ACC | TPR | TNR | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5dB | Method of [39] | 82.55% | 91.68% | 93.72% | 82.60% | 97.36% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using paralinguistic feature | 66.17% | 97.87% | 88.22% | 72.44% | 99.24% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using spectral feature | 57.38% | 69.40% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 76.27% |
10dB | Method of [39] | 84.52% | 93.29% | 94.52% | 84.62% | 97.89% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using paralinguistic feature | 67.48% | 99.04% | 91.49% | 81.10% | 99.37% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using spectral feature | 71.59% | 82.47% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 90.46% |
15dB | Method of [39] | 84.68% | 92.58% | 94.62% | 84.94% | 97.68% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using paralinguistic feature | 74.39% | 94.40% | 96.89% | 92.91% | 97.56% |
| Â | SEC-SVM using spectral feature | 83.55% | 92.70% | 99.00% | 97.27% | 96.97% |