Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of overall average recognition rates of different number of MFCC features with Fisher-Markov selector on three test sets of Aurora 2 task

From: Autocorrelation-based noise subtraction method with smoothing, overestimation, energy, and cepstral mean and variance normalization for noisy speech recognition

Number of MFCC coefficients

Recognition rate (%)

Overall average of recognition rate (%)

Set A

Set B

Set C

3 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

57.38

44.95

51.29

51.21

4 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

58.48

46.25

52.65

52.46

5 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

60.41

48.16

54.46

54.34

6 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

60.27

48.04

54.34

54.22

7 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

62.49

50.13

56.45

56.36

8 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

64.87

52.98

58.31

58.72

9 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

64.23

52.01

57.48

57.91

10 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

65.24

53.18

59.12

59.18

11 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

64.56

52.63

57.98

58.39

12 MFCC + log energy + their first and second order derivatives

65.96

54.78

60.32

60.35