Table 3 Comparing performance of different training strategies of PFL
Evaluation groups | FL Classical [4] | PFL Type-A | PFL Type-B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Direct-discriminator | Discriminator-projection | Feature-projection |
| Â | EER | EER | EER |
G1 | 5.297 | 5.037 | 5.481 |
G2 | 15.089 | 14.100 | 25.242 |
G3 | 6.935 | 6.975 | 7.239 |
G4 | 19.961 | 18.986 | 20.485 |
G5 | 6.375 | 6.680 | 7.438 |
G6 | 17.355 | 15.796 | 19.703 |
G7 | 15.799 | 16.012 | 16.902 |
G8 | 24.619 | 25.096 | 31.103 |
G9 | 17.153 | 17.443 | 20.49 |
G10 | 23.805 | 23.653 | 25.927 |
G11 | 17.448 | 17.871 | 21.632 |
G12 | 22.806 | 22.993 | 26.048 |
mean(\(\mu\)) | 16.053 | 15.887 | 19.137 |