Skip to main content

Advertisement

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing
EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing Cover Image

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research Article
  • Open Access

Set-Membership Proportionate Affine Projection Algorithms

  • 1Email author,
  • 2 and
  • 3
EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing20072007:034242

https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/34242

©  Stefan Werner et al. 2007

  • Received: 30 June 2006
  • Accepted: 15 November 2006
  • Published:

Abstract

Proportionate adaptive filters can improve the convergence speed for the identification of sparse systems as compared to their conventional counterparts. In this paper, the idea of proportionate adaptation is combined with the framework of set-membership filtering (SMF) in an attempt to derive novel computationally efficient algorithms. The resulting algorithms attain an attractive faster converge for both situations of sparse and dispersive channels while decreasing the average computational complexity due to the data discerning feature of the SMF approach. In addition, we propose a rule that allows us to automatically adjust the number of past data pairs employed in the update. This leads to a set-membership proportionate affine projection algorithm (SM-PAPA) having a variable data-reuse factor allowing a significant reduction in the overall complexity when compared with a fixed data-reuse factor. Reduced-complexity implementations of the proposed algorithms are also considered that reduce the dimensions of the matrix inversions involved in the update. Simulations show good results in terms of reduced number of updates, speed of convergence, and final mean-squared error.

Keywords

  • Acoustics
  • Convergence Speed
  • Adaptive Filter
  • Matrix Inversion
  • Projection Algorithm

[123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Signal Processing Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, Otakaari 5A, Espoo, 02150, Finland
(2)
Department of Electrical Engineering, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro, 2229-270, Brazil
(3)
Signal Processing Laboratory, COPPE/Poli/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21945-970, Brazil

References

  1. Martin RK, Sethares WA, Williamson RC, Johnson CR Jr.: Exploiting sparsity in adaptive filters. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2002,50(8):1883-1894. 10.1109/TSP.2002.800414View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Duttweiler DL: Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 2000,8(5):508-518. 10.1109/89.861368View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Gay SL: An efficient, fast converging adaptive filter for network echo cancellation. Proceedings of the 32nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, November 1998, Pacific Grove, Calif, USA 1: 394-398.Google Scholar
  4. Benesty J, Gay SL: An improved PNLMS algorithm. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), May 2002, Orlando, Fla, USA 2: 1881-1884.Google Scholar
  5. Rao BD, Song B: Adaptive filtering algorithms for promoting sparsity. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '03), April 2003, Hong Kong 6: 361-364.Google Scholar
  6. Khong AWH, Benesty J, Naylor PA: An improved proportionate multi-delay block adaptive filter for packet-switched network echo cancellation. Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '05), September 2005, Antalya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  7. Doğançay K, Naylor P: Recent advances in partial update and sparse adaptive filters. Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '05), September 2005, Antalya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  8. Deshpande A, Grant SL: A new multi-algorithm approach to sparse system adaptation. Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '05), September 2005, Antalya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  9. Werner S, Apolinário JA Jr., Diniz PSR, Laakso TI: A set-membership approach to normalized proportionate adaptation algorithms. Proceedings of the 13th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO '05), September 2005, Antalya, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng H, Doroslovăcki M: Proportionate adaptive algorithms for network echo cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2006,54(5):1794-1803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tanrıkulu O, Doğançay K: Selective-partial-update normalized least-mean-square algorithm for network echo cancellation. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '02), May 2002, Orlando, Fla, USA 2: 1889-1892.Google Scholar
  12. Kivinen J, Warmuth MK: Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors. Information and Computation 1997,132(1):1-63. 10.1006/inco.1996.2612MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Benesty J, Gänsler T, Morgan D, Sondhi M, Gay S (Eds): Advances in Network and Acoustic Echo Cancellation. Springer, Boston, Mass, USA; 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoshuyama O, Goubran RA, Sugiyama A: A generalized proportionate variable step-size algorithm for fast changing acoustic environments. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '04), May 2004, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 4: 161-164.Google Scholar
  15. Gollamudi S, Nagaraj S, Kapoor S, Huang Y-F: Set-membership filtering and a set-membership normalized LMS algorithm with an adaptive step size. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 1998,5(5):111-114. 10.1109/97.668945View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Diniz PSR, Werner S: Set-membership binormalized data-reusing LMS algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2003,51(1):124-134.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. Werner S, Diniz PSR: Set-membership affine projection algorithm. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2001,8(8):231-235. 10.1109/97.935739View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gollamudi S, Kapoor S, Nagaraj S, Huang Y-F: Set-membership adaptive equalization and an updator-shared implementation for multiple channel communications systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1998,46(9):2372-2385. 10.1109/78.709523View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Malipatil AV, Huang Y-F, Andra S, Bennett K: Kernelized set-membership approach to nonlinear adaptive filtering. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '05), March 2005, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 4: 149-152.Google Scholar
  20. Fogel E, Huang Y-F: On the value of information in system identification—bounded noise case. Automatica 1982,18(2):229-238. 10.1016/0005-1098(82)90110-8MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Dasgupta S, Huang Y-F: Asymptotically convergent modified recursive least-squares with data-dependent updating and forgetting factor for systems with bounded noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1987,33(3):383-392. 10.1109/TIT.1987.1057307View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Deller JR Jr., Nayeri M, Liu MS: Unifying the Landmark developments in optimal bounding ellipsoid identification. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing 1994,8(1):43-60. 10.1002/acs.4480080105MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Joachim D, Deller JR Jr.: Multiweight optimization in optimal bounding ellipsoid algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2006,54(2):679-690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gollamudi S, Nagaraj S, Huang Y-F: Blind equalization with a deterministic constant modulus cost-a set-membership filtering approach. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP '00), June 2000, Istanbul, Turkey 5: 2765-2768.Google Scholar
  25. Diniz PSR, Werner S: Set-membership binormalized data-reusing algorithms. Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID '00), June 2000, Santa Barbara, Calif, USA 3: 869-874.Google Scholar
  26. Werner S, de Campos MLR, Diniz PSR: Partial-update NLMS algorithms with data-selective updating. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2004,52(4):938-949. 10.1109/TSP.2004.823483MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Werner S, Apolinário JA Jr., de Campos MLR, Diniz PSR: Low-complexity constrained affine-projection algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 2005,53(12):4545-4555.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Nagaraj S, Gollamudi S, Kapoor S, Huang Y-F: BEACON: an adaptive set-membership filtering technique with sparse updates. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1999,47(11):2928-2941. 10.1109/78.796429View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Werner S, Diniz PSR, Moreira JEW: Set-membership affine projection algorithm with variable data-reuse factor. Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS '06), May 2006, Island of Kos, Greece 261-264.Google Scholar
  30. Rupp M: A family of adaptive filter algorithms with decorrelating properties. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1998,46(3):771-775. 10.1109/78.661344View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Stefan Werner et al. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement