Open Access

Perceptual Coding of Audio Signals Using Adaptive Time-Frequency Transform

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing20072007:051563

https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/51563

Received: 22 January 2006

Accepted: 5 July 2007

Published: 19 August 2007

Abstract

Wide band digital audio signals have a very high data-rate associated with them due to their complex nature and demand for high-quality reproduction. Although recent technological advancements have significantly reduced the cost of bandwidth and miniaturized storage facilities, the rapid increase in the volume of digital audio content constantly compels the need for better compression algorithms. Over the years various perceptually lossless compression techniques have been introduced, and transform-based compression techniques have made a significant impact in recent years. In this paper, we propose one such transform-based compression technique, where the joint time-frequency (TF) properties of the nonstationary nature of the audio signals were exploited in creating a compact energy representation of the signal in fewer coefficients. The decomposition coefficients were processed and perceptually filtered to retain only the relevant coefficients. Perceptual filtering (psychoacoustics) was applied in a novel way by analyzing and performing TF specific psychoacoustics experiments. An added advantage of the proposed technique is that, due to its signal adaptive nature, it does not need predetermined segmentation of audio signals for processing. Eight stereo audio signal samples of different varieties were used in the study. Subjective (mean opinion score—MOS) listening tests were performed and the subjective difference grades (SDG) were used to compare the performance of the proposed coder with MP3, AAC, and HE-AAC encoders. Compression ratios in the range of 8 to 40 were achieved by the proposed technique with subjective difference grades (SDG) ranging from –0.53 to –2.27.

[1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829]

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ryerson University

References

  1. Painter T, Spanias A: Perceptual coding of digital audio. Proceedings of the IEEE 2000,88(4):451-515. 10.1109/5.842996View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Mallat SG, Zhang Z: Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1993,41(12):3397-3415. 10.1109/78.258082View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Umapathy K, Krishnan S: Joint time-frequency coding of audio signals. Proceedings of the 5th WSES/IEEE Multiconference on Circuits, Systems, Communications, and Computers (CSCC '01), July 2001, Crete, Greece 32-36.Google Scholar
  4. Umapathy K, Krishnan S: Low bit-rate coding of wideband audio signals. Proceedings of IASTED International Conference on Signal Processing, Pattern Recognition and Applications (SPPRA '01), July 2001, Rhodes, Greece 101-105.Google Scholar
  5. Heusdens R, Vafin R, Kleijn WB: Sinusoidal modeling using psychoacoustic-adaptive matching pursuits. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2002,9(8):262-265. 10.1109/LSP.2002.802999View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Verma TS, Meng THY: Sinusoidal modeling using frame-based perceptually weighted matching pursuits. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '99), March 1999, Phoenix, Ariz, USA 2: 981-984.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Heusdens R, Jensen J, Korten P, Vafin R: Rate-distortion optimal high-resolution differential quantisation for sinusoidal coding of audio and speech. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (ASPAA '05), October 2005, New Paltz, NY, USA 243-246.Google Scholar
  8. Heusdens R, Jensen J: Jointly optimal time segmentation, component selection and quantization for sinusoidal coding of audio and speech. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP '05), March 2005, Philadelphia, Pa, USA 3: 193-196.Google Scholar
  9. I. JTC1/SC29/WG11 : Overview of the MPEG-4 standard. in International Organization for Standardisation, March 2002Google Scholar
  10. Herre J, Grill B: Overview of MPEG-4 audio and its applications in mobile communications. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP '00), August 2000, Beijing, China 1: 11-20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Herre J, Brandenburg K, et al.: Second generation ISO/MPEG audio layer-3 coding. The 98th Audio Engineering Society Convention (AES '95), February 1995, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. Meltzer S, Moser G: MPEG-4 HE-AAC v2—audio coding for today's digital media world. EBU Technical Review, Geneva, Switzerland; 2006.Google Scholar
  13. Ryden T: Using listening tests to assess audio codecs. In Collected Papers on Digital Audio Bit Rate Reduction. Edited by: Gilchrist N, Grewin C. Audio Engineering Society, New York, NY, USA; 1996:115-125.Google Scholar
  14. Mallat S: A wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA; 1998.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen L: Time-frequency distributions: a review. Proceedings of the IEEE 1989,77(7):941-981. 10.1109/5.30749View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Brandenburg K, Bosi M: MPEG-2 advanced audio coding: overview and applications. The 103rd Audio Engineering Society Convention, August 1997, Ney York, NY, USA 4641.Google Scholar
  17. http://www.apple.com/MPEG4/aac/
  18. Eberlein E, Popp H: Layer-3, a flexible coding standard. The 94th Audio Engineering Society Convention, March 1993, Berlin, Germany 3493.Google Scholar
  19. http://www.iis.fraunhofer.de/bf/amm/
  20. http://lame.sourceforge.net/index.php
  21. http://www.mp3dev.org/
  22. http://www.winamp.com/
  23. Orfanidis SJ: Introduction to Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA; 1996.Google Scholar
  24. Goodwin MM: Adaptive Signal Models: Theory, Algorithms and Audio Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11N6675 : Report on the verification tests of MPEG-4 parametric coding for high quality audio. in International Organization for Standardisation, July 2004Google Scholar
  26. Heusdens R, Jensen J, Kleijn WB, et al.: Bit-rate scalable intraframe sinusoidal audio coding based on rate-distortion optimization. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 2006,54(3):167-188.Google Scholar
  27. van de Par S, Kohlrausch A, Heusdens R, Jensen J, Jensen SH: A perceptual model for sinusoidal audio coding based on spectral integration. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005,2005(9):1292-1304. 10.1155/ASP.2005.1292View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Korten P, Jensen J, Heusdens R: High-resolution spherical quantization of sinusoidal parameters. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 2007,15(3):966-981.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Christensen MG, van de Par S: Efficient parametric coding of transients. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 2006,14(4):1340-1351.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© K. Umapathy and S. Krishnan. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.